|
|
||
![]() |
Western
Missouri Shooters Alliance |
![]() |
|
|
||
![]() ![]() http://media.www.dailyvidette.com/media/storage/paper420/news/2008/04/03/Viewpoint/Gunning.For.Safety-3299164.shtml |
Gunning for safety |
| 4/3/08 |
At what point in life do jobs gain the right to abridge your constitutionally guaranteed rights?
In Des Moines, Iowa a Pizza Hut driver was recently suspended for carrying a hand gun while he was delivering. A handgun which was barred by Pizza Hut in their policies. This delivery driver's handgun was found after he used it to defend himself from a would-be robber. Allegedly, the delivery driver was purposefully called to an apartment where the robber was ready to rob him. The person who was attempting to rob the delivery driver then pointed a gun at his head and demanded money. The delivery driver pulled out his gun in order to defend himself from the robber. He survived unharmed. The robber sustained at least three gun-shot wounds, but survived his injuries. A situation such as this calls into question Pizza Hut's policy. Although it is understandable for Pizza Hut to want as little armed conflict as possible on their delivery routes, it is also completely understandable for delivery drivers to want the ability to protect themselves. The second amendment grants you the right to carry a handgun, so what right does Pizza Hut have to supersede that right in their policy? The delivery driver was suspended for breaking the rules and carrying his handgun. He should have been; he broke the rules. However, that does not mean that the rule should not be questioned. By carrying his handgun, the Pizza Hut delivery driver saved his own life, or at the very least, saved his wallet and other valuables. His gun was licensed. He had the right to carry it, and he obviously had a use for it. Why then, does Pizza Hut choose to abridge his rights? This is not an office building or desk job. As a delivery driver, he is placed in many situations where his life may be in danger. It is unlikely Pizza Hut allows him to skip deliveries in dangerous parts of town. On the other hand, it isn't necessarily only the driver who should be considered. With all of the small frustrations that accompany being a delivery driver, it is understandable for the public to be less than pleased about them carrying guns. That being said, when it comes down to it, carrying a handgun is still within your constitutional rights as long as you follow the proper procedures. It all comes back to one question. Who should have guns? If a person is placed, daily, into situations where his life may be in danger, it makes sense and is fair that the driver may carry a gun. Pizza Hut should consider adjusting their policies to not only protect the safety of their patrons, but also the safety of their work force. Sometimes guns actually do save lives. |

|
|
Return
to the WMSA Home Page |
|
Copyright © 1997-2008
Western Missouri Shooters Alliance. All rights reserved, but all you
have to do is ask. |
| Please send suggestions, corrections, and comments to the Webmaster |
| Hosted by Suncoast Networks. |
| Last update: 4 April 2008 |