|
The Washington
Times
www.washtimes.com
Ohio court restores Cincinnati suit against gun firms
Published 6/13/2002
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The Ohio
Supreme Court yesterday reinstated a lawsuit that Cincinnati filed
against gun makers in an attempt to recoup the cost of gun-related
violence.
The justices ruled 4-3 that an appeals
court was wrong in dismissing the lawsuit and ordered the case back to
Hamilton County Common Pleas Court. Justice Francis Sweeney said
yesterday's ruling does not imply that Cincinnati will be successful in
its lawsuit but that the city had enough facts to pursue its suit.
"While we do not predict the outcome
of this case, we would be remiss if we did not recognize the importance
of allowing" this type of lawsuit to go past the initial stages,
Justice Sweeney said.
Chief Justice Thomas Moyer disagreed,
saying the perceived injuries to Cincinnati were too far removed from
the conduct of gun makers to give the city the ability to sue.
"The question is not whether the city
can prove that it has suffered damages, but whether the city can prove
that those damages are attributable to the wrongdoing of the gun
manufacturers as opposed to other, independent factors," Justice
Moyer said.
Cincinnati and other local governments say
that millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on police and
emergency workers in response to gun-related crime, plus the costs of
hospitalization, investigation and prosecution.
"In a four-month period, 107
shootings, 13 on one street, four on one block, 200 police calls of
'shots fired' in eight days," Paul DeMarco, an attorney for
Cincinnati, argued before justices in October. "The police are so
overwhelmed that homicide cops are working 29-hour shifts."
Attorneys for gun makers told the court
there is no legal basis for such lawsuits. They said ruling in
Cincinnati's favor would make manufacturers of other legal products
equally liable.
"Alcoholic beverage manufacturers,
who also produce a legal product, would be held liable for misuse of
alcohol in the city of Cincinnati," said attorney James Dorr.
"The same thing with automobile manufacturers who have a
generalized awareness that their automobiles are going to be involved in
accidents."
The lawsuit involves several gun makers,
including Beretta U.S.A., Colt's Manufacturing Co. and Smith &
Wesson Corp.
Copyright © 2002
News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. |